Matthew Niemerg co-founder Aleph Zero, has written a guest post.
Yesterday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a groundbreaking ruling that could fundamentally reshape cryptocurrency protocol regulation. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a landmark ruling yesterday that could fundamentally reshape how cryptocurrency protocols are regulated. Van Loon V. Department of Treasury, the court found that the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) exceeded its authority when it sanctioned Tornado Cash’s immutable smart contracts.
This ruling is based on an incredibly simple question. Can computer code which cannot be controlled or modified be considered? “property”? The appellate court’s answer was an emphatic no.
Tornado Cash is a cryptocurrency anonymizing service that helps preserve privacy by pooling users’ digital assets together, making transactions harder to trace. By 2022, OFAC sanctioned It after North Korean hackers allegedly laundered over $455,000,000 of stolen funds. But the court found that since Tornado Cash’s core protocols are “immutable” – meaning they cannot be changed or controlled by anyone – they don’t qualify as property that can be sanctioned under existing law.
Crypto Currency: The Watershed Moment
“Because these immutable smart contracts are unchangeable and unremovable, they remain available for anyone to use,”Judge Don Willett noted that, even with sanctions in place, “the targeted North Korean wrongdoers are not actually blocked from retrieving their assets.”
The cryptocurrency industry has reached a new milestone. First time in history, the federal court of appeals has recognized that some decentralized protocols work completely differently from other traditional properties or businesses. Because noone has recognized the importance of decentralization, a federal appeals court acknowledged that certain protocols operate as something completely different from traditional businesses or property. “owns”These smart contracts are autonomous and independent from any control entity.
It has significant implications. This ruling creates an effective safe harbour for protocols which are truly decentralized and cannot be controlled or modified. While OFAC can still sanction individuals and companies, it cannot sanction the underlying code itself – at least under current law.
Balancing privacy and security
The Court explicitly allowed Congress to update its 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act in order to accommodate modern technology. “Perhaps Congress will update IEEPA, enacted during the Carter Administration, to target modern technologies like crypto-mixing software,”The ruling was noted. “Until then, we hold that Tornado Cash’s immutable smart contracts…cannot be blocked under IEEPA.”
It highlights the wider challenge of regulating technologies to protect privacy that are used both for legitimate and illegal purposes. Tornado Cash has been used as evidenced by the court to help protect individuals’ privacy and to prevent harassment when they donated to Ukrainian war effort. Tornado Cash was also used to facilitate money laundering by the bad guys.
While privacy is important, the crypto industry needs to work on ways to prevent illicit use. Users could be asked to prove that their money is legitimate or implemented. “anonymity revoking”Systems that can only unmask a user under certain circumstances and with the proper supervision.
What is the Way Forward?
Judge Willett acknowledged the government’s concerns about illicit finance as “undeniably legitimate.”But he stressed that courts must follow the law exactly as it is written. “tinker with it.”The court’s ruling is conclusive
“Mending a statute’s blind spots or smoothing its disruptive effects falls outside our lane.”
This balanced approach – recognizing both the importance of preventing criminal activity and the need to protect privacy-enhancing innovation – points the way forward. Legislators should not try to force the new technology into outdated regulatory frameworks. Instead, they need to create updated laws which recognize and address legitimate security concerns while also understanding decentralized systems.
This decision is an important step forward for innovation in technology and recognition of the fact that digital technologies do not always fit into legal categories such as property or ownership. It is important to build a framework that’s as complex as the technology they are regulating.
This post was posted in: Legal, Privacy, Guest Posts Guest Contributor 
Matthew Niemerg
Matthew Niemerg is the co-founder and CEO of Aleph Zero Foundation. He combines his expertise in math and blockchain in order to advance DeFi, AI and other projects.
@matthewniemerg Editor
News Desk
CryptoSlate offers a comprehensive source of crypto-related news, insight, and statistics. Focusing Bitcoin, macroeconomics, DeFi and artificial intelligence.
Twitter Email Editor @cryptoslate Ad 
Changelly’s Crypto Deals for Black Friday and Cyber Monday: Web3 meets the Holiday Season.
Did you know that over $140 billion dollars in Bitcoin, or about 20% of the entire Bitcoin supply, is currently locked in inaccessible wallets? Or maybe you have lost access to your Bitcoin wallet? Don’t let those funds remain out of reach! AI Seed Phrase Finder is here to help you regain access effortlessly. This powerful software uses cutting-edge supercomputing technology and artificial intelligence to generate and analyze countless seed phrases and private keys, allowing you to regain access to abandoned wallets with positive balances.
