Stop the speculation about Satoshi Nakamoto

article-image

The human race is clinging to mysteries which are bordering on obsessions. 

The moon landing — did we actually go, and if we did, is the footage real? And what about the pyramids — built by laborers and farmers, or were those 80-ton granite blocks actually set in place by ancient alien technology?

Satoshi’s real identity is a strange cultural anomaly that hasn’t stopped. 

Craig Wright led this particular media circus over many years until the courts took legal action against him. Wright’s error has been proved, and now we are all doomed. 

Over the past six-month period, there have been multiple new attempts to revive the Nakamoto narrative. Cullen Hoback’s Money Electric, The Bitcoin Mystery was the first documentary on HBO. A new Channel 4 documentaire lacked any compelling evidence or tangible theories.

It is worth reading my take on HBO’s conclusion, which was that the longtime Bitcoin contributor Peter Todd, who had been hiding in plain view, was actually Satoshi. 

Between those releases we also received threads about X. One of them was from Matthew Sigel who is head of VanEck’s digital asset research. He suggested tech billionaire Jack Dorsey as the person behind the Nakamoto name.

Veteran Bitcoiner Jameson Lopp shared his method of debunking the Dorsey theory during a premiere episode of Supply Shock on Thursday — a brand-new Bitcoin brand and podcast hosted by Bitcoin Historian Pete Rizzo. 

ee0fbef3349330e62d55842ac6537904 - Stop the speculation about Satoshi Nakamoto

Lopp busted a previous suggestion that Hal Finney is Nakamoto, by proving Finney competed in Santa Barbara in the 10-mile race at the time Nakamoto emailed early developer Mike Hearn. 

See also  Crypto still in its early stages?

Lopp eventually found that after combing through Dorsey’s older Twitter posts it was almost impossible for Dorsey coordinate a dual life as Nakamoto. This led him to dismiss the theory.

“I think a lot of the people who are accused of being Satoshi candidates are Bitcoin legends in their own right,” Lopp told Rizzo.

“Like they don’t have to be Satoshi — they have contributed in a variety of different ways to being Satoshi in the way that we are all Satoshi, right? It’s like anyone who contributes to [Bitcoin] is essentially building upon the legacy where Satoshi, you know, left the project open to the world so that anyone who cared could contribute to it.”

It’s obvious, but here is the truth: No one can prove a theory. The only legitimate proof would be to sign a transaction with one of Satoshi’s keys — but even if someone did, we would likely never know for sure how those keys came into their possession — sending us on a never-ending loop of inconclusive proof.

The Satoshi debate should be relegated to boring normie talk points like the Apollo moon landing or the Pyramids. 

You won’t be seeing me around Empire much in the near future. It’s time to go on a quest of the spirit. I want to know more about Bitcoin, which I heard is a huge deal. It has been an honor.

Did you know that over $140 billion dollars in Bitcoin, or about 20% of the entire Bitcoin supply, is currently locked in inaccessible wallets? Or maybe you have lost access to your Bitcoin wallet? Don’t let those funds remain out of reach! AI Seed Phrase Finder is here to help you regain access effortlessly. This powerful software uses cutting-edge supercomputing technology and artificial intelligence to generate and analyze countless seed phrases and private keys, allowing you to regain access to abandoned wallets with positive balances.
leadzevs/ author of the article

LeadZevs (John Lesley) is an experienced trader specializing in technical analysis and forecasting of the cryptocurrency market. He has over 10 years of experience with a wide range of markets and assets - currencies, indices and commodities.John is the author of popular topics on major forums with millions of views and works as both an analyst and a professional trader for both clients and himself.